What does Rule 3.3 require regarding candor toward the tribunal?

Rule 3.3 of Kentucky's Rules of Professional Conduct emphasizes the necessity of honesty and integrity when appearing before a tribunal. The rule specifically requires lawyers to avoid making false statements to a court, which includes both affirmatively presenting false evidence and omitting material facts that could mislead the court. This commitment to candor ensures that the judicial process is based on truthful representations, allowing the court to make decisions informed by accurate information.

Engaging in dishonest conduct not only undermines the legal process but also jeopardizes the lawyer's professional reputation and ethical standing. This is why the requirement to avoid false statements is crucial—it upholds the integrity of the legal system and serves the broader interest of justice.

Other options presented do not align with the core principles of Rule 3.3. For instance, providing all evidence to the opposition does not address the requirement for candor specifically to the tribunal, and agreeing with all attorneys present does not reflect the individual responsibility of each lawyer to maintain honesty before the court. Lastly, the obligation to disclose previous judgments may vary based on context and ethical considerations, but it is not a direct requirement for candor as described in Rule 3.3.